fbpx

Origins: The Advertising Approach That Makes Sense

Advertising can be expensive. And as with most expensive purchases, advertising costs should be held accountable. In recruiting,  advertising is ideally measured by hired drivers.  But you cross a line somewhere when you say “calculating advertising cost per hire is a calculation” instead of a mixture of wishful thinking, oversimplification, and good intentions.

How We Wish Advertising Worked

It’d be great if  each applicant would see one and only one of your advertisements, then apply once through a single path.  After applying you would either hire the candidate or not – making the hiring decision within minutes of the application being submitted.  For the candidates you don’t hire, you would never hear from them again.  In this pretend world, a $1,000 investment could, for example, lead to 100 applications ($10/application), and to 5 hires ($200/hire).  Easy peasy – cost per hire calculated.

Unfortunately, reality usually rains on this fantasy parade. 

How Advertising Actually Works

You spend the $1,000 on several sources that deliver a variety of types/volumes of candidates. These advertising sources offer multiple paths for the candidate to follow to find your application – that $1,000 leads to applications tagged with a variety of “sources” and “referral codes.” Now you’ve got a massive web to untangle.

Complication #1: You can’t look at something as simple as application counts; you have to count people!

Many drivers submit their applications through multiple paths – so your $1,000 attracts some of the same drivers that have applied through other sites. If you’re only counting applications, you’ll have multiple applications from the same driver.

Complication #2: Who gets credit for a given driver?

From the time the driver applies until the time the driver is hired, you often have to make a new set of advertising decisions. Do these decisions take into account all of the paths and reapplies of each driver?

Complication #3: You can’t just look at statuses.

Driver’s statuses change backward and forward throughout the hiring process. You might decide “scheduled for orientation” is the right status to use as a proxy for a successful ad spend.  But wait, the driver scheduled on Thursday may not be scheduled on Friday – and if you look at the status again next Tuesday, he may be scheduled again.   

Complication #4: Progress through the hiring process can throw off basic status or tag-based point-in-time reporting.

You place an advertisement in August – but the driver doesn’t hire on until September.  Now, what do you do – count the September hire against the August spend (and risk the August numbers drifting as you work through that set of drivers) or count the September hire (and give your September spend credit for something it may not have delivered)? 

Complication #5: Timing issues can introduce even more error – which may not be a big deal looking at annual spends but can start to skew numbers at the monthly/weekly level.

Drivers that came through on your $1,000 spend but didn’t end up getting hired often re-apply in the future (as much as 40% of apps are “re-applies” in any given months across the platform).  But wait, now what happens when you try to look at the performance trend of a given advertising source?  When the driver re-applies, his status gets updated to reflect the current hiring cycle – so running reports for source/status data for apps received last year now reflect his current status.  But you saved all those reports, right?

Complication #6: Re-applies make historical reporting much harder.

We want a driver’s progress through your hiring process to change (see complication #4) until we want it to stay the same.

How Does Origins Address the Real World Complications?

#1 Application Counts vs. People

Origins tracks multiple paths and counts people. Origins also knows when one driver has multiple applications and gives credit to all sources.

#2 Attribution

Each ad source that a driver touches will get full credit. There are several other attribution models possible – but they bring complexity without better decision-making ability.

#3 You Can’t Just Look at Statuses

Statuses change backward and forward in the hiring process. Origins uses funnels to report on all sources and movements forward and backward.

#4 Non-linear Progress Through Recruiting Process

Origin’s back-end process recalculates every active driver, every night.

#5 Timing Issues

Origins looks at the date of the first application and matches that up with the month the advertising was purchased.

#6 Re-Apply Problem

In Origins, once a driver goes inactive, that data is frozen so historical reporting is preserved.

Want to learn more about Origins? Contact us at [email protected]!

Share this post